Evaluation of outcomes of duodenal ulcer perforation closure using single-port laparoscopic surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63583/p9n74p06Từ khóa:
Perforated ulcer, single-port laparoscopy, duodenal ulcerTóm tắt
Objective: To investigate the clinical and paraclinical characteristics of patients with perforated duodenal ulcers and to evaluate the outcomes of single-port laparoscopic closure of the perforation. Subject and method: A cross-sectional descriptive study combined with a prospective interventional longitudinal follow-up was conducted on 87 patients with perforated duodenal ulcers who underwent single-port laparoscopic closure from January 2021 to January 2024. Result: Among the 87 patients, the mean age was 52.3 ± 10.7 years, with males accounting for 60.9%, primarily in the 41-60 age group (51.7%). A history of peptic ulcer disease was the most common comorbidity (36.8%). In 79.3% of cases, symptoms began abruptly within 12 hours, with abdominal pain (97.7%) and peritoneal signs (92.0%) as the predominant features. Most patients were classified as Boey score 0 (80.5%). The perforation was located on the anterior duodenal bulb in 63.2% of cases, with a size of 5-10 mm in 66.7%. Diagnosis was mainly based on upright abdominal X-rays (74.7%) and CT scans (67.8%). Closure was performed using an X-stitch in 63.2% of patients, with drain placement in 97.7%. The mean operative time was 74.5 minutes. The complication rate was low (4.5%), and no mortality was reported. Conclusion: Duodenal ulcer perforation predominantly affects middle-aged men and typically presents with classic clinical symptoms and a short onset time. Simple suture closure combined with drainage via single-port laparoscopy yields favorable surgical outcomes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
1. Aro P., Storskrubb T., Ronkainen J. et al (2006). Peptic Ulcer Disease in a General Adult Population: The Kalixanda Study: A Random Population-based Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(11), 1025-1034.
2. Bertleff M.J.O.E., Lange J.F. (2010). Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Review of History and Treatment. Digestive Surgery, 27(3), 161-169.
3. Budzyński P., Pędziwiatr M., Grzesiak-Kuik A. et al (2015). Changing patterns in the surgical treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer - single centre experience. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques, 430-436.
4. Hồ Hữu Thiện (2008), Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị thủng ổ loét dạ dày - tá tràng bằng phẫu thuật nội soi, Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học, Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế.
5. Wang Y.R., Richter J.E., Dempsey D.T. (2010). Trends and Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Peptic Ulcer Disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006. Annals of Surgery, 251(1), 51.
6. Lau J.Y., Sung J., Hill C. et al (2011). Systematic Review of the Epidemiology of Complicated Peptic Ulcer Disease: Incidence, Recurrence, Risk Factors and Mortality. Digestion, 84(2), 102–113.
7. Thorsen K., Søreide J.A., Søreide K. (2013). Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 21(1), 25.
8. Kim J.-M., Jeong S.-H., Lee Y.-J. et al (2012). Analysis of Risk Factors for Postoperative Morbidity in Perforated Peptic Ulcer. Journal of Gastric Cancer, 12(1), 26-35.
9. Farzan R., Behboodi F., Sade B. et al. (2015). Epidemiological Study of Perforation of Gastric Peptic Ulcer in Patients Admitted to Poursina Hospital. Zahedan J Res Med Sci, 17(4).
10. Lin K.J., García Rodríguez L.A., Hernández-Díaz S. (2011). Systematic review of peptic ulcer disease incidence rates: do studies without validation provide reliable estimates?. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 20(7), 718–728.
11. Choi Y.J., Kim T.J., Bang C.S. et al (2023). Changing trends and characteristics of peptic ulcer disease: A multicenter study from 2010 to 2019 in Korea. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 29(44), 5882–5893.
12. Møller M.H., Adamsen S., Thomsen R.W. et al (2011). Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. British Journal of Surgery, 98(6), 802-810.
